SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 22510

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The chief administrative officer – Appellant
Versus
S.Renold yasuthason & 2 ors – Respondent
SC/33/A/574/2022



Cause Title/Judgement-Entry
Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/574/2022
( Date of Filing : 26 Dec 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. The chief administrative officer
Anna medical college & research centre RA puram, chennai 28
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. S.Renold yasuthason & 2 ors
1/15 c south thamaikulam kanyakumari 629701
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,  CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE  THE HON’BLE  THIRU. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH  :   PRESIDENT

                      

F. A. No.574 of 2022

 

(Against the Order dated 14.10.2022 made in RBT/C.C.No.202 of 2022  on the file of D.C.D.R.C. Ariyalur)

 

Wednesday, the 27th day of September, 2023

 

 

The Chief Administrative Officer,

Anna Medical College & Research Centre,

10, Dr. Durgabai Deshmukh Road,

RA Puram, Chennai – 600 028.              ... Appellant/ 2nd opposite Party

 

-Versus-

1. S.Renald Yesuthason,

    S/o Y.Samuel,

    1/15C, Near Village Office,

    South Thamaraikulam

    And Post- 629 701,

    Kanyakumari District.                       … 1st Respondent/Complainant

 

2. Anna Medical College & Research Centre,

    Royal Road, Solitude,

    Republic of Mauritius,

    Office in India at:

    1312, 11th Main Vijay Nagar,

    Bangalore – 560 040.                  ...  2nd  Respondent/ 1st  Opposite Party

 

3. Vaidyalingam,

    The Chairman,

    Anna Medical College & Research Centre,

    Accura Speciality Labs & Scans,

    No.26/53, 2nd Street, Kamaraj Avenue,

    Adayar, Chennai – 600020.       …      3rd Respondent/3rd Opposite Party

 

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant/2nd opposite party :  M/s. K.M.Balaji

Respondent No.1/ Complainant                   :  M/s. Elizabeth Ravi

Respondent No.2/ Opposite party No.3        :  M/s. S.Ganesh

 

This appeal came up for final hearing on 20.09.2023 and on hearing the arguments of the counsel for the appellant/2nd op and on perusing the material records, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Commission made the following:

ORDER

JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH  :   PRESIDENT

   This appeal has been filed by the 2nd opposite party under section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, as against the order dated 14.10.2022 passed in RBT/C.C.No.202 of 2022, by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ariyalur, allowing the complaint filed by the 1st Respondent  herein, in part.

2.    The case of the complaint is that the complainant had completed his Higher Secondary Course Examination conducted by the State Board of Education, Government of Tamil Nadu, in March 2014, securing 929 marks out of 1200 marks. The marks secured by the complainant, was below the cut-off marks fixed for the admission into the Medical Course. However, Attracted by misleading advertisements made by the opposite parties, that the first opposite party institution situated at Mauritius is recognized by the Medical Council of India, and that having admission with the University therein, it is providing education of aspiring medical students, from around the world, to pursue the Under Graduate Medical Programmes (MBBS), through its extensive blend of structured lecture, lab and clinical training activities. Believing the same,  the complainant applied to the first opposite party, at their Chennai office, and the second opposite party and Admission Manager, received a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- under a cash receipt on 11.07.2014, and thereafter, paid a sum of Rs.9,50,000/- to the credit of the first opposite party, on 14.07.2017, in the Bank Account maintained by them in their name, with ICICI Bank, and the balance of remittances were made at the branch office of ICICI Bank, Kanyakumari Branch, and the Dean issued an order of admission dated 17.07.2014, and at the time of payment of another sum of Rs.1,00,000/- but, without any receipt, the complainant handed over the followi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top