SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 22765

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S RAHEJA DEV. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NEENA THOMAS – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 12.10.2022 Date of hearing: 12.05.2023 Date of Decision: 17.10.2023 FIRST APPEAL NO. 180/2022 IN THE MATTER OF M/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED., W4D, 204/5, KESHAV KUNJ, WESTERN AVENUE, CARIAPPA MARG, SAINIK FARMS, NEW DELHI-110062.

(Through: Mr. Siddharth Banthia, Advocate)

...Appellant VERSUS MS. NEENA THOMAS, C-72, MAHAVIR ENCLAVE-I, PALAM DABARI ROAD, NEW DELHI.

(Through: Mr.Vivek Kumar, Advocate)

...Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE MR. J.P. AGRAWAL, MEMBER (GENERAL) Present: Mr. Siddharth Banthia, Counsel for the Appellant.

Mr. Vivek Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

JUDGMENT

1. The Present Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant impugning the Order dated 01.09.2022 passed by District Commission in Consumer Complaint No. 269/2021 titled ‘Neena Thomas Vs. Raheja Developers whereby the Appellant’s right to file the reply was closed on the ground that the Complaint Copy was received by the Appellant/Opposite Party on

07.02.2022 and the time to file the reply has passed.

2. The C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top