SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 23537

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Gaddam Pramatha – Appellant
Versus
1.Sunshine Hospital – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD (ADDITIONAL BENCH)

C.C.106/2018 Between :

Miss. Gaddam Pramatha, D/o. Gaddam Prasanna Kumar, Hindu,Aged about: 26 years, Occ: Medical Profession, R/o. flat No.302, Mahitha Pride, Bachupally, Kuthubullapur (M), Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

…Complainant And

1. Sunshine Hospital, Rep. by its Managing Director, Dr. Guruva Reddy.

2. Dr. Kamalakar, C/o. Sunshine Hospital. The address of both Respondents is PG Road, Opp: Parsi Dharmashala, Paradise, Secunderabad.

…Opposite parties Counsel for the Complainant : P.V.S.K. Chakravarthy Counsel for the Opposite party No.1 & 2 : P.V. Janani &

Associates QUORAM : Hon’ble Sri V.V.Seshubabu, Member (M-J), &

Hon’ble Smt.R.S.Rajeshree, Member (N-J)

MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE ORDER : (PER HON’BLE SRI V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER-JUDICIAL)

1. The complaint is filed on 11.05.2018 U/s.17 (1) (a) (i) of C.P. Act, 1986, seeking directions against the opposite parties to pay Rs.1 crore, including Rs.14 lakhs for the expenditure incurred on the surgeries of the Complainant and for costs.

2 (a). The brief averments of the complaint are that Complainant met with a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top