SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 24061

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mark D Almeda – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar G. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:A M ,Respondent Advocate: Keshav Murthy B

Date of Filing :14.02.2013 Date of Disposal :17.01.2022 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF JANUARY 2022 PRESENT Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER MrsM.DIVYASHREE : LADY MEMBER CC-NO.25/2013

1. Mark D’ Almeida

2. Suzan D’ Almeida

8/1, Krishnamma Garden, 1st Cross, Anjanappa Block, Benson Town, Bengaluru-46.. ..Complainant/s (By Sri.A.M.Iktear Uddin, Advocate)

VS

1.

Sunil Kumar.G Abhi Constructions (Contractor), # 109, SharadaNilaya, 3rd Cross, 4th Main, Vinayaka Layout, Vijayanagara, Bengaluru-40. ..Opposite Party/s (By Sri.B.Keshavamurthy, Advocate)

O R D E R

Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. This complaint is filed U/s 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with a prayer against OP for immediate relief of Rs.21,59,761/- which has to be refund to the excess amount paid in comparison to the works completed and to refund Rs.6 lakhs for demolishing and rebuilding the chajjas works paid to the subsequent contractors and in addition to such amount Rs.10 lakhs for all the harassment, mental trauma, delay and poor quality of his house.

2. The Complainants have stated that in early December 2010, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top