SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 24732

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Harshwardhan – Appellant
Versus
Sakra World Hospital – Respondent
SC/29/CC/86/2021



Cause Title/Judgement-Entry
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/86/2021
( Date of Filing : 24 Nov 2021 )
 
1. Harshwardhan
Aged 33 yrs, S/o Late Brahamdeo Prasad, R/At SG 1403, Golden Blossom Apartments, Opp Sri Satya Sai Baba Ashram, Kadugodi, Belathur, Bluru 560067.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sakra World Hospital,
Devarabeesanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore 560103. Reptd by its Chief of Medical Services.
2. Dr. Sikora Sadiq Saleem
Aged 61 yrs, Place of work at Sakra World Hospitl, Devarabeesanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore 560103.
3. Dr.Chandrasekhar P,
Place of work at Sakra World Hospitl, Devarabeesanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore 560103.
4. Dr.Shiv Kumar R
Place of work at Sakra World Hospitl, Devarabeesanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore 560103.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 01 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

BEFORE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
CC/86/2021
Date of Filing : 24 Nov 2021
 
 
Harshwardhan Aged 33 yrs, S/o Late Brahamdeo Prasad, R/At SG 1403, Golden Blossom Apartments,
Opp Sri Satya Sai Baba Ashram, Kadugodi, Belathur, Bluru 560067.
 
                                                                                                                                               ....Appellant/s
Sakra World Hospital, Devarabeesanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore 560103. Reptd by its Chief of Medical Services.

   and others

                                                                                                                                            .....Respondet/s

01.02.2022

ORDER

By Sri Ravishankar, Judicial Member

Advocate for complainant filed a memo to withdraw the complaint as the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission is fixed at Rs.2 crores.  As per the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission was fixed at Rs.10 crores.  Later it came to be amended to Rs.2 crores.

Hence, in view of the said memo and submission made by the advocate for complainant, the complaint is hereby returned to the complainant along with documents if any with a liberty to file a fresh complaint before the appropriate Court/Authority as per the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.  Accordingly, the complaint is returned to the complainant.

The complainant is entitled to avail a benefit u/s 14 of the Limitation Act.

 

                                        Sd/-                                                                   Sd/-

                                                    (Sunita .C. Bagewadi)                                      (Ravishankar)       

                                                                            Member                                                Judicial Member

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top