(

BEFORE EiE STA'IE CONSUI,ER DXSPUTE REDRRJ SAL q OMIIIISSION;

ORISSA L CUTT AG K .

F. A.

Noo Branch Managerr India Nerv Assurarce Co.Ltd.

41/t.Ot .reypore IIain Fioadr P. O/DIst : llabara 4g,orrr, represented through its dttty Constitrrted attoyrey Senlop r;iv jsional I,fanagere IJeW f rd.l.a AsSUranc6 Co.Ltd.

z At:

Cantarunent Road, Tov;n/Dis tCuttack.

.......

Appellant. (Opp.party }lo.1 in court below)

- ^I/ersus Mrrsafer Hu5saln S/o Laie Rolef llr Hussa At: pathan street, p.o/Dlst:

I{abarangpllr. , (Cornplalnant in the coLrrt belou)

r3___ Branch l,{ansgsr, AnChra Bark , At/p.o/P,S/O:st:

Nabarang)ur"

(Opp.party No.2 ln the court belou)

o .. . . . . . Respordgrrts.'

^ r_t d^__-

Sl. No. of Order	note as to action (if any), ORDER WITH SIGNATURE taken on Order
3'2'z	F.A.	96 0F 2007
	Heard tfre te the parties. 2. This app erstwhile Consumer Prot after called the Act). H this appeal shall be,referr their respective status be Forum. 3. The case of. the is that the complainant "Nageena Saree" Centre alteged inter-alia that the were insured with the OP for the period from 29.0 is alleged that on 5..9.200	rned counsel for both al is filed U/S.15 of ion Act,1 986(herein- nafter, the parties to d to with reference to re the learned District mplainant, in nutshell as got a shop namely at Nabarangpur. lt is stock of the said shop No.1 through OP No.2 2OO3 to 28.0 5.2004. It the said shop caught

the entire stocks were re, the matter was OP. The surveyor and after survey he e complainant was nt computed by the filed.

the written version tion lodged they who made survey

45,0001- but the Op to which the So, there is no rt of the OP. Forum,after hearing lowing order;-

ocp-Mp{Tcp (FS&cw) 2-1,0O,00a_29$_2O20 .1, B,M.,New lndia eypore is directed to ount of Rs.2,0O,O0O/-

rs to )only the includes cost of this ays of leceipt of this the amount wilt bear um after: lapse of the sel for 'the appellant District Forum has ngt considering the OP. According to him, the surveyor being .64,6001-. Learned ave passed order to However, learned

			note as to action (if any), taken on Order
			ng the impugned could have anq settte the to set-aside the appeal. r the respondent is for computing him the cheque d to by the t he has got all mage of same by to. confirm the

oc p:1i4p4Tc P (FS &CW ) 2-1,@,OOr;- 2s +2020 SI No. Date of of(,,,:1 l Order ORDER WITH SIGNATURE:' Office note as to action (if any ), lnt- nst Consid d the submission rof respective counsels.,for parties, perused tthe DFR and impugned order

10 The complaii ant is required to pprove the deficiency 'in service the OP. lt is admnitted fact that the complainaht after incurring ther loan has opened a saree It is not in disspput te that he has .purchased insurance polic:yy for I the stock and the shop r OP No.1. lt is aallso not in dispute that durin currency of the ploolliicy the shop and of the the shop \,Vefe damaged by fire on 05 .2003, lt is also nroott in ir ir was deputed ffoor

Sl. No. Office note as to action (if any), of Orde taken on Order
icy is admitted and ty the facts remain rred by the fire. in receipts to show stock but the he has verified the computed loss at d in law that the bsence of any other . Therefore, the showing loss of . But the learned a finding to pay tion as :to the

oGP:MP4TCP ^(FS&GW) 2-1,00,OOr29{-2020

Sl. No. of		j' note as to ection (if anY), ORDER WITH SIGNATURE takei on Order considered. On the mputed as loss. otherhand, Rs.1,48,/56 is aforesaid discussion, ned order of District while affirmin$ the im herebY modified the t of Rs.1,48,756.00 to ys from todaY, failing the comPlainant within 45 12 o/o from the date which it will carry interest 'of payment. posed of accordinglY'

st. No.

o:' oRDER wrH siellrune note as to action (if any), e order be supplied they may download or webtsite of this ? ^{as copy} of order forthwith.

President ocp-Mp-cTcp (FS&CW) 2_1,OO,OOG2}_6_2020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document