SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 26050

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MRS.RASHMI VIVEK KANGRALKAR – Appellant
Versus
GIRIJA CHS.LTD.THROUGH ITS SECRETARY – Respondent


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI MA/19/439 IN Consumer Complaint No.CC/19/143 Mrs.Rashmi Vivek Kangralkar Flat no.1205 & 1206, A wing Girija, Neelkanth Heights Pokhran Road no.2 Thane (West) 400 610 ...........Applicant/Complainant Versus Girija Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.

Through its Secretary Neelkanth Heights Pokhran Road no.2 Thane (West) 400 610 ............Opponents BEFORE: Smt.S.T.Barne, In-charge President K.M.Lawande, Member PRESENT: Ms.Poonam Makhijani-Advocate for applicant/complainant Advocate Simil Mejari i/b. Advocate Samrat Thakkar for opponent.

ORAL ORDER (5th April, 2022)

Per Hon’ble Smt.S.T.Barne, In-charge President

1. Ms.Poonam Makhijani-Advocate is present for execution applicant. Mr.Samrat Thakkar-Advocate is present for non-executant. Parties are also present in person. They have requested to take the matter on today’s board for cancellation of warrant, for compliance of interim order and to settle the matter fully and finally i.e. complaint which is still pending. This execution application is against an interim order. Hence allowed to take both the matters on today’s board.

2. Complainant -Rashmi Vivek Kangralkar is present in pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top