2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 26268
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
S.R. CHANDRASEKHARAN – Appellant
Versus
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER – Respondent
SC/33/CC/15/2014
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru Justice R. SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Thiru R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
CC.NO. 15/2014
DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF APRIL 2022
1. S.R.Chandrasekharan
New No.3, Old No.2
Vinayakapuram Main Road
Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053
2. S.C.Deepak Ramamurthi
New No.3, Old No.2,
Vinayakapuram Main Road
Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053 ....Complainants
Vs
1. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
Rep. by its Senior Divisional Manager
Divisional Office No.712500
Mount Casa Blanca Building II Floor
260, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006
2. City Bank NA
Rep. by its Business Manager (Cards)
Card Member Services
P.O.Box.No.4830, Anna Salai P.O
Chennai – 600 002 ....Opposite parties
Counsel for complainant : M/s N. Premalatha
Counsel for 1st opposite party : M/s. M.B.Gopalan
Counsel for 2nd opposite party : M/s. Namasivayam
This complaint coming before us for hearing finally on 6.12.2021 and on hearing the arguments of counsel appearing for bothsides and upon perusing the material records this Commission made the following order:
ORDER
Justice R. SUBBIAH, PRESIDENT
1. This complaint has been filed under Sec.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as against the Insurance Company/ opposite parties for the following reliefs:
i. Praying for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards the insured amount under the Good Health Policy together with interest @12% p.a., from 8.3.2006 to the date of complaint
ii. Pay Rs.10,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony
iii. To pay Rs.20,000/- towards cost
2. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows:
The 1st complainant is the father of the 2nd complainant. It is the case of the complainant that 1st complainant’s wife Mrs.Vaishnavi Chandrasekharan, and his son S.C.Deepak Ramamurthi had been covered under a Good Health Policy Certificate, which was issued on 13.1.2006. The period of Insurance is from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2006. The sum insured was Rs.10 lacs each for the complainant and his wife and Rs.2 lakhs for his son. On 13.2.2006, the 1st complainant and his wife met with an accident while travelling in an autorickshaw at Bangalore. Both of them were hospitalised in Hosmat Hospital for treatment. The 1st complainant had successfully recovered from treatment, and his wife Mrs.Vaishnavi succumbed to the injury and expired on 8.3.2006. While he was in hospital, undergoing treatment, before the death of his wife, he received the aforesaid Insurance Certificate issued by the 1st opposite party. Consequent to the death of his wife on 8.3.2006, the 1st complainant had preferred a claim for Rs.10 lakhs towards the Insurance amount to the 1st opposite party, vide his intimation letter dt.20.3.2006. While so, about third week of April 2006, he had received a letter dt.31.3.2006 from the 1st opposite party, intimating the 1st complainant that they are cancelling the policy and the certificate of insurance issued earlier has become invalid. As per the holder of the citi bank credit card the complainant has consented to take insurance cover with the 1st opposite party following a vigorous canvassing done by an Executive of the said bank on 19.12.2005. Despite repeated requests the complainant was not given any information broacher and was not fully briefed on the benefits under various health Insurance Schemes but the premium amount of Rs.4519/- was promptly debited from the complainant’s account, on 27.12.2005. He has expressed his displeasure over phone to the Citi Bank for not furnishing the details of his insuranc