STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Ajaib Singh – Respondent
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.
CASES PERTAINING TO ORIGINAL ALLOTTEES: REFUND WITH
9% INTEREST AND CONSOLIDATED COMPENSATION/COSTS AS AWARDED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSION
1) First Appeal No.410 of 2021 Date of institution : 23.11.2021 Date of decision : 13.07.2022 Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, through Estate Officer, Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (Bathinda Development Authority) PUDA/BDA Complex, Bhagu Road, Bathinda.
….Appellant/Opposite Party Versus Ajaib Singh son of Kamikar Singh, resident of Gas Agency Road, Budhlada, District Mansa.
….Respondent/Complainant First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 05.04.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mansa.
2) First Appeal No.266 of 2022 Date of Institution : 05.04.2022 Date of Decision : 13.07.2022 The Estate Officer, Bathinda Development Authority (BDA), PUDA Complex, Bhagu Road, Bathinda.
……Appellant/Opposite Party Versus Vijay Pal Makkar S/o Sh.Lekh Raj Makkar, aged about 53 years R/o H.No.402, L.B. Enclave, Sector 49-A, Chandigarh.
…..Respondent/Complainant First Appeal under Section 41 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.