SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 28202

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
INDIAN POST OFFICE – Appellant
Versus
SMT.SUSHILA BAI – Respondent


M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)

FA No.417 / 2015.

Pravar Adhikshak, Dakghar, Bhartiya Dak Vibhag, Mukhya Dakghar Karyalay, Kothi Bazar, Hoshangabad (M.P.). …. APPELLANT.

Versus Smt. Susheela Bai Battariya, wd/o Late Shri Harishankar Battariya, R/o Pashu Chikitsalay Campus, Jumerati Hoshangabad (M.P.). …. RESPONDENT.

As per Shri Justice Shantanu Kemkar, (oral) :

Date of O R D E R

Order

08.08.2022 Shri Rajeev Jain, learned counsel for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 10.4.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hoshangabad (for short the ‘District Commission’) in CC No.238/2014 whereby the District Commission has allowed the complaint filed by the respondent – complainant and directed the appellant to pay insured amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest from

27.1.2013 till date of the order @ 9% p.a. In addition Rs.5000/- towards economic loss and mental agony and Rs.2000/- towards costs has been ordered to be paid.

2. Brief facts of the case are stated herein below :

The respondent’s husband was working on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top