SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 28223

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PUDA ( Now BDA) – Appellant
Versus
Narain Dass – Respondent


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

Date of institution : 19.04.2022 Date of decision : 10.08.2022 Punjab Urban Development Authority (now BDA), PUDA Complex, Bhagu Road, Bathinda, through its Estate Officer.

….Appellant/Opposite Party Versus Narain Dass (since deceased) through his LRs namely as under:

1) Shakuntla Devi wd/o Late Sh. Narain Dass;

2) Shanky Nagpal S/o Late Sh. Narain Dass;

Both Residents of House No.2604, near Satya Narayan Mandir, Tehsil Rajpura Town, District Patiala.

….Respondents/Complainants First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 29.11.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mansa.

Quorum:-

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member.

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Present:-

For the appellant : Sh. Anuj Kohli, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. Deepak Kansal, Advocate.

JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRESIDENT Appellant/opposite party i.e. Punjab Urban Development Authority (now BD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top