SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 28722

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Akber – Respondent


BEFORE THE TELANGANASTATE CONSUMER DISPUTEs REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.324 OF 2017 AGAINST ORDERSI N CC.NO.234 OF 2016,D ISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-RANGAR EDDY Between:

M/s.ICICI Bank Limited, Regional Office, Credit Card Division, Rep. by Manager, Flat No. 12, Nanakramguda,Gachibowli-Hyderabas(TS)

Representedby its POA holder and Authorized signatory Mr.HarshwardhanD eshmukh .Appellant/Opposite Party And MohammedAkber, S/o.MohammedH ussain, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Marketing Executive, R/o.H.No.9-1-1/77/1/1, Babunagar, Langer House, Defence Colony, Golconda, Hyderabad (TS).

Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opp.Party:

Mr.S. Nagesh Reddy Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant:

Party-in-person QUORAM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL,H ON'BLE PRESIDENT, HON'BLE SMT.MEENA RAMANATHAN...LADY MEMBER FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THoUSAND TwENTY Two *******

Order: (Per Smt.Meena Ramanathan, Hon'ble Lady Member)

1. This is an appeal filed U/s. 15 of Consumer Protection Act,1986 against the order dated 11.08.2017 of the District Consumer Commission, Ranga Reddy, made in CC.No.234/2016 prayingthis Commission to set aside the impugned order and to allow the appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top