SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 29005

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The Managing Partner Soorya Pipe Distributors Karaikal – Appellant
Versus
V.Karunanithi Madurai & 2 Others. – Respondent
SC/CB1/33/FA/85/2014



Petitioner Advocates:Mr.R.Karmegam-App. ,Respondent Advocate: R1-S.Arokiaselvaramesh.R2 & R3-Givenup.

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH OF THE TAMILNADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MADURAI.

PRESENT: THIRU.N. RAJASEKAR, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER THIRU.S.KARUPPIAH, JUDICIAL MEMBER F.A.Nos.74/2014, F.A.84/2014 & 85/2014 (Against the order made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014 on the file of the District Forum, Madurai.)

FRIDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022.

(1) F.A.No.74/2014 (Against the order made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014 on the file of the District Forum, Madurai.) M.P.Navaneethakrishnan, Proprietor, Arupadai Veedu Rakayee Amman Bore Wells, Nagalakshmi Illam, 14, Park Town, 1st Street, P & T Nagar, Madurai. Appellant/1st Opposite Party -Vs-

1. V.Karunanithi, S/o Veeranan, 4/651-2, Viravanji Street, Thasildhar Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. Jain Irrigations Systems Limited, Through its Managing Director, Jain Plastic Park, Jalgaon – 425 001. 2nd Respondent/2nd Opposite Party

3. Soorya Pipe Distributors, Through its Managing Director, 308-C, Church Street, Karaikal. 3rd Respondent/3rd Opposite Party Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party-1 : Mr.D.Malaichamy, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent-1/Complainant : Mr.S.Arockia Selva Ramesh,Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondents-2&3/Opp.Parties-2&3 : Mr.R.Karmegam, Advocate.

(2) F.A.No.84/2014 (Against the order made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014 on the file of the District Forum, Madurai.)

The Managing Director, Jain Irrigations Systems Limited, Jain Plastic Park, Jalagaon – 425 001. Appellant/2nd Opposite Party -Vs-

1. V.Karunanithi, S/o Veeranan, 4/651-2, Viravanji Street, Thasildhar Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. M.P.Navaneethakrishnan, Proprietor, Arupadai Veedu Rakayee Amman Bore Wells, Nagalakshmi Illam, 14, Park Town, 1st Street, P & T Nagar, Madurai. 2nd Respondent/1st Opposite Party

3. The Managing Director, Soorya Pipe Distributors, 308-C, Church Street, Karaikal. 3rd Respondent/3rd Opposite Party Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party-2 : Mr.R.Karmegam, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent-1/Complainant : Mr.S.Arockia Selva Ramesh,Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondents-2&3/Opp.Parties-1&3 : Given-up.

(3) F.A.No.85/2014 (Against the order made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014 on the file of the District Forum, Madurai.)

The Managing Director, Soorya Pipe Distributors, 308-C, Church Street, Karaikal. Appellant/3rd Opposite Party -Vs-

1. V.Karunanithi, S/o Veeranan, 4/651-2, Viravanji Street, Thasildhar Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. M.P.Navaneethakrishnan, Proprietor, Arupadai Veedu Rakayee Amman Bore Wells, Nagalakshmi Illam, 14, Park Town, 1st Street, P & T Nagar, Madurai. 2nd Respondent/1st Opposite Party

3. The Managing Director, Jain Irrigations Systems Limited, Jain Plastic Park, Jalagaon – 425 001. 3rd Respondent/2nd Opposite Party Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party-3 : Mr.R.Karmegam, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent-1/Complainant : Mr.S.Arockia Selva Ramesh,Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondents-2&3/Opp.Parties-1&2 : Given-up.

Both the appeals coming before us for final hearing on 06.09.2022 and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following:-

COMMON ORDER

THIRU.S.KARUPPIAH, JUDICIAL MEMBER.

1. All the three appeals in F.A.No.74/2014, F.A.No.84/2014 & F.A.No.85/2014 have been preferred by the opposite parties 1 to 3 against the order made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014 on the file of the District Forum, Madurai

2. As the three appeals are arising out of one and the same order of the learned District Forum, Madurai made in C.C.No.167/2009, dated 04.04.2014, these appeals are jointly heard and disposed of by this Common Order. 5. The case of the complaint is as follows;-

The complainant is having lands in Survey Nos.161, 162 and 163 at Pahayani Piranthini Village, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. He intended to dug bore well for cultivation and he approached the opposite party bore well contractor to dig the bore well. As per his advise and convinc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top