STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR.VIKAS V.PATHARE – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY SALES MAHIM BRANCH PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD.AND ORS – Respondent
BEFORE THE HON’BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI FIRST APPEAL NO.FA/18/690 (Arisen out of order dated 12/07/2018 passed in Consumer Complaint No.CC/17/230 by District Consumer Commission, Central Mumbai)
Mr.Vikas V. Pathare, R/o. Flat No.9, 5th Floor, Ratan Apartment, Chitale Path, ……Appellant Dadar, Mumbai – 400028 (Org.Complainant)
Versus
1. Vijay Sales [Mahim Branch]
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.
120/122 Dimple Building, L.J. Road, Mahim (W) Mumbai – 400018.
2. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office, 502/503, Sahara Plaza Complex, Windfall Building, 5th Floor, J.B. Nagar, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400059.
3. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., Corporate Office, 12th Floor, Ambience Tower, Ambience Island, NH-8, Lane No.V40, DLF Phase III Sector 24, Gurgaon, …… Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Haryana – 122002. (Org.Opposite Party Nos.1-3)
BEFORE:
Justice S.P. Tavade, President A.Z.Khwaja, Judicial Member For Appellant : POA of Appellant- Mr.Shekhar Pathare For Respondent : Advocate Mrs.Shaila Taware Nos.2 and 3
ORDER
(30/09/2022)
Per: A.Z. Khwaja, Judicial Member
1) Appellant Mr.Vikas V. Pathare has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.