SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 29387

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MR.VIKAS V.PATHARE – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY SALES MAHIM BRANCH PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD.AND ORS – Respondent


BEFORE THE HON’BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI FIRST APPEAL NO.FA/18/690 (Arisen out of order dated 12/07/2018 passed in Consumer Complaint No.CC/17/230 by District Consumer Commission, Central Mumbai)

Mr.Vikas V. Pathare, R/o. Flat No.9, 5th Floor, Ratan Apartment, Chitale Path, ……Appellant Dadar, Mumbai – 400028 (Org.Complainant)

Versus

1. Vijay Sales [Mahim Branch]

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.

120/122 Dimple Building, L.J. Road, Mahim (W) Mumbai – 400018.

2. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office, 502/503, Sahara Plaza Complex, Windfall Building, 5th Floor, J.B. Nagar, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400059.

3. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., Corporate Office, 12th Floor, Ambience Tower, Ambience Island, NH-8, Lane No.V40, DLF Phase III Sector 24, Gurgaon, …… Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Haryana – 122002. (Org.Opposite Party Nos.1-3)

BEFORE:

Justice S.P. Tavade, President A.Z.Khwaja, Judicial Member For Appellant : POA of Appellant- Mr.Shekhar Pathare For Respondent : Advocate Mrs.Shaila Taware Nos.2 and 3

ORDER

(30/09/2022)

Per: A.Z. Khwaja, Judicial Member

1) Appellant Mr.Vikas V. Pathare has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top