STATE CO NS U M E R ^{D IS P} UTES ^{R E DR ESSALCO M M ISS I O N, O D IS HA, CUTTACK} FIRST APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2015 (From an order dated 3.2.20LG passed by the District Consumer Forum, Mayurbhanj in C.C. No. 59 of 20LLl tclcl Prudential Life lnsurance Co.ltd., Baripada Branch, At - Bada Bazar, BariPada, Po/Ps - Baripada, Dist - Mayurbhanj ...

Appellant Vrs.

Sri Kousik Kumar Puhan,

S/o Shri Khageswar Puhan, At - Nagpal, Po/Ps - ^Udala,

Dist - Mayurbhanj ... Respondent :

For the appellant ^{M/s S.Sastry & Associates} For the respondent ^{: M/s D.K.patra & Associates} PRESENT:

HON,BLEDR.JUSTICED.P.CHOUDHURY,PRESIDENT, DR.P.K.PRUSTY, ^MEMBER AND MISS S.L.PATTNAIK, MEMBER DATED THE ^{O4th NOVEMBER, 2022} ORDER MISS S.L.PATTNAIK. MEMBER Heard learned ^counsel for the appellant'

i{omv.,tttr

3.

Here is an appeal filed u/s L5 of the erstwhile Consumer

Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called the 'Act'). Parties to this appeal shall be referred to with reference to their

respective status before the District Forum.

4.

The brief fact of the case is that, the complainant had

purchased a Health policy under l.C.l.C.l prudential Health Saver Schemes from the O.P bearing policy No.L330L4L6. ^The annual premium of Rs.10,000/- was