STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Gopinath Ranganath S/o.Mr.Gopinath Rep by Mrs.Vijaya Seshagiri Rao and anr – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Naga Constructions Rep by its Prop.Mr.G.SelvaKumar and anr – Respondent
SC/33/CC/74/2015
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru Justice R. SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Thiru R VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
CC.NO. 74/2015
DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022
1. Gopinath Ranganath
S/o. Gopinath
Rep. by Mrs. Vijaya Seshagiri Rao
2. Mrs. Vijaya Seshagiri Rao
W/o. Ranganathan
Both are residing at
1st Floor, Flat No.104
Door No.172, R.K.Mutt Road
Mandeivalli, Chennai – 600 028 ....Complainants
Vs
1. M/s. Naga Constructions
Rep. by its Prop; G. Selvakumar
No.58/3, 6th Main Road
Malleshwaram, Bangalore- 560 055
Also at:
No.242/3, 18th Main Road
7th Main, Sadashivanagar
Bangalore – 560 080
2. G. Selva Kumar
S/o. M.C.Gurusamy
No.58/3, 1st Floor, 17th Cross
6th Main Road, Malleshwaram
Bangalore – 560 055
Also at:
No.242/3, 18th Main Road
7th Main, Sadashivanagar
Bangalore – 560 080 ....Opposite parties
Counsel for complainant : M/s K. Ganesan
Counsel for opposite parties : M/s. Anand Sasidharan
This complaint coming before us for hearing finally on 7.9.2022 and on hearing the arguments of counsel appearing for complainant and upon perusing the material records this Commission made the following order:
ORDER
Justice R. SUBBIAH, PRESIDENT
1. This complaint has been filed under Sec.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as against the opposite party for the following reliefs:
1. The 1st opposite party to complete the pending works and set right the defects as mentioned in para 7 of the complaint in relation to the flat situated in the 1st Floor, Old Door No.104, New Door No.172, R.K.Mutt Road, Mylapore, Chennai -28, with the built up area of 1340 sq.ft with two covered car parking slots as per specification in the construction agreement dt.15.10.2012.
2. To direct the opposite parties to get the necessary revised plan from the competent authority at their cost.
3. The opposite parties be jointly and severally directed to pay compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony.
4. Another Rs.20,00,000 towards deficiency in service.
5. The opposite parties be jointly and severally directed to pay a sum of Rs.32,50,000/- being the interest for delays in handing over possession.
2. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows:
The opposite parties are the builders. During first week of September 2012, the 1st opposite party represented to the complainant that the 1st opposite party had been in the field of construction activities, and the 2nd opposite party is a qualified civil engineer and they are developing residential apartments in a joint venture basis, with the owner vide Joint Venture Agreement dt.16.2.2011 in respect of the property bearing old Door No.104, New Door No.172, R.K.Mutt Road, Mandaveli, Chennai -600 028. The opposite parties have further represented that they have applied for requisite approval from the competent authority for the purpose of putting up proposed construction over the above property. Believing the words of the opposite parties, the complainant had entered into an Agreement of Sale and Construction dt.15.10.2012, with opposite parties, alongwith the owners of the land duly represented by the 2nd opposite party, for the purchase of an extent of 1/9th undivided share in the land out of 5184 sq.ft being 576 sq.ft. with a view to construct an apartment of flat bearing No.104, situated in the 1st floor, with the built up area of 1340 sq.ft., with tw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.