Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT, PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FIROZ AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
AXIS BANK LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of illness and family emergencies were insufficiently documented. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. legal standards dictate strict adherence to appeal timelines. (Para 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. the appeal was filed late with inadequate justification. (Para 18) |
1. The present appeal has been filed on 24.08.2020 impugning the order dated 16.09.2019 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-VI (New Delhi), Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate in C.C. No. 134/2016.
2. The application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal is still pending and is being decided.
3. The record has been carefully and thoroughly perused.
Appellant has filed written submissions vide diary no. 8116 dated 17.10.2022. Despite opportunities, respondent has preferred not to file written submissions.
4. Provision of law has not been mentioned in this application. This application is being considered under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 .This application is supported by an affidavit of Mr. Firoz Ahmad i.e. applicant/appellant/complainant.
5. As per the case of applicant/appellant/complainant, the certified copy of the impugned order dated 16.09.2019 was prepared on 02.10.2019 and the s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
