SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 32295

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Rajansingh.M.Verma – Appellant
Versus
Nileshkumar Sukhajirav Jadhav – Respondent


Details DD MM YY
Date of Judgment 10 11 2022
Date of filing 04 10 2022
Duration 06 01 -

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION GUJARAT STATE, AHMEDABAD.

Revision Petition NO. 39/2022 Court No. 1

1. Satyaa Construction Through Proprietor Rajansingh M. Verma & Anr. …Petitioner Vs

1. Nileshkumar Sukhajirav Jadhav …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Ms. A.C.Raval, Member Apperence : Mr. Amit Patel for the petitioner Order by Hon’ble Ms. A.C. Raval, President

1. The Petitioner/ Original opponent has filed this revision petition under section 47 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 09.09.2022 passed by the learned Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Ahmedabad (Rural) in miscellaneous application for production of document filed in C.C. No.175/2016.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Amit Patel for the petitioner.

3. Fact of the case: The present petitioner is opponent in the CC No.175 of 2016 filed before the Learned District Commission by filing the application before the learned District Commission the petitioner sought production of certain documents by the complainant. The application for production of documents is reject

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top