SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 32421

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MS. NEERU VIG & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SH. MAYUR MANSHARAMANI – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 04.08.2014 Date of hearing: 03.08.2022 Date of Decision: 15.11.2022 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 772/2014 IN THE MATTER OF

1. MS. NEERU VIG, W/o Mr. B. M. Vig, R/o SF-65, Ansal Vyapar Kendra, Sushant Lok-1, Block-C, Gurgaon (Haryana).

2. MRS. KAMLESH TALUJA, W/o Mr. Anil Taluja, R/o C-8/8205, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi.

3. M/S EVER RICH BUILDCON PVT. LTD., Through Director: Mr. Anoop Taneja & Ashish Vig, H-68, Bali Nagar, New Delhi.

ALSO AT;

SF-65, Third Floor, Vyapaar Kendra, Sushant Lok-I, Gurgaon-122001 (Haryana).

(Through: M/s Mittal & Mittal Co.)

…Appellants VERSUS MR. MAYUR MANSHARAMANI, R/O- C-2B, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058.

… Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Present: None for the Parties.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are:

“Briefly stated the case of the complainant is that he entered into an agreement to purchase third floor of property no C-5A/40 with Mrs. Neeru Vig and Mrs. Kamlesh Taluja. The negotiation for the property was done through Anoop Taluja an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top