SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 30929

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ICICI BANK LTD vs
SC/32/MA/6/2025



STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KERALA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. SC/32/MA/6/2025 IN SC/32/A/435/2017 ICICI BANK LTD PRESENT ADDRESS - RACE COURCE CIRCLE, VADODARA, GUJARATH- 390007,KERALA.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus AJITH KUMAR N PRESENT ADDRESS - 34/1211-B, PALAZHIYIL HOUSE, EDAPPALLY P O, COCHIN-

682024,KERALA.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

NEMO FOR THE RESPONDENT:

NEMO DATED: 07/08/2025

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM M.A.No.06/2025 in APPEAL No.435/2017 ORDER DATED : 07.08.2025 (Against the order in C.C.No.879/2014 on the file of DCDRC, Ernakulam)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER APPELLANTS:

1. ICICI Bank having its Registered Office at Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara, Gujarat – 390 007 rd

2. ICICI Bank Ltd., M.G. Road Branch, 3 Floor, M.G. Square, Opposite Padma Theatre, Kochi – 682 035 represented by its Manager

3. ICICI Home Finance Ltd. represented by its duly constituted Attorney, ICICI Bank having its Registered Office at Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara, Gujarat – 390 007

4. ICICI Bank, B.M. Complex, Edapalli, Kochi – 682 024 (by Advs. Lal K. Joseph & Suja Madhav)

Vs.

RESPONDENTS:

1. Ajith Kumar N., S/o Narayan Kurup, 34/1211-B, Palzhiyil House, Edappally P.O., Cochin – 682 024

2. Shiny Ajith Kumar, W/o Ajith Kumar N., 34/1211-B, Palzhiyil House, Edappally P.O., Cochin – 682 024

ORDER

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER This is a petition filed by the appellant in A 435/2017 to correct a clerical mistake crept in the operative portion of the judgment.

2. The appeal was filed against the order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam in C.C.No.879/2014. The appeal was allowed, the order passed by the District Commission was set aside and the complaint was dismissed. A mistake crept in the operative portion of the judgment in recording the case number as C.C.No.873/2014 instead of C.C.No.879/2014. This mistake is sought to be corrected.

3. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. Perused the records.

4. We are satisfied that a typographical mistake occurred in noting the case number as C.C.No.873/2014 instead of C.C.No.879/2014. The above mistake has to be corrected. Hence, the request is allowed. The operative portion of the judgment in appeal with respect to the case number is corrected as C.C.No.879/2014 instead of C.C.No.873/2014. The office shall carry out the correction. Recall the copy of the orders, if any issued and effect corrections in those copies also.

JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER SL SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR PRESIDENT SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top