2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 30929
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ICICI BANK LTD vs
SC/32/MA/6/2025
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KERALA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. SC/32/MA/6/2025 IN SC/32/A/435/2017 ICICI BANK LTD PRESENT ADDRESS - RACE COURCE CIRCLE, VADODARA, GUJARATH- 390007,KERALA.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus AJITH KUMAR N PRESENT ADDRESS - 34/1211-B, PALAZHIYIL HOUSE, EDAPPALLY P O, COCHIN-
682024,KERALA.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:
NEMO FOR THE RESPONDENT:
NEMO DATED: 07/08/2025
ORDER
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM M.A.No.06/2025 in APPEAL No.435/2017 ORDER DATED : 07.08.2025 (Against the order in C.C.No.879/2014 on the file of DCDRC, Ernakulam)
PRESENT:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER APPELLANTS:
1. ICICI Bank having its Registered Office at Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara, Gujarat – 390 007 rd
2. ICICI Bank Ltd., M.G. Road Branch, 3 Floor, M.G. Square, Opposite Padma Theatre, Kochi – 682 035 represented by its Manager
3. ICICI Home Finance Ltd. represented by its duly constituted Attorney, ICICI Bank having its Registered Office at Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara, Gujarat – 390 007
4. ICICI Bank, B.M. Complex, Edapalli, Kochi – 682 024 (by Advs. Lal K. Joseph & Suja Madhav)
Vs.
RESPONDENTS:
1. Ajith Kumar N., S/o Narayan Kurup, 34/1211-B, Palzhiyil House, Edappally P.O., Cochin – 682 024
2. Shiny Ajith Kumar, W/o Ajith Kumar N., 34/1211-B, Palzhiyil House, Edappally P.O., Cochin – 682 024
ORDER
SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER This is a petition filed by the appellant in A 435/2017 to correct a clerical mistake crept in the operative portion of the judgment.
2. The appeal was filed against the order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam in C.C.No.879/2014. The appeal was allowed, the order passed by the District Commission was set aside and the complaint was dismissed. A mistake crept in the operative portion of the judgment in recording the case number as C.C.No.873/2014 instead of C.C.No.879/2014. This mistake is sought to be corrected.
3. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. Perused the records.
4. We are satisfied that a typographical mistake occurred in noting the case number as C.C.No.873/2014 instead of C.C.No.879/2014. The above mistake has to be corrected. Hence, the request is allowed. The operative portion of the judgment in appeal with respect to the case number is corrected as C.C.No.879/2014 instead of C.C.No.873/2014. The office shall carry out the correction. Recall the copy of the orders, if any issued and effect corrections in those copies also.
JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER SL SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR PRESIDENT SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER