SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 31014

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
UCO BANK PATANCHERU BRANCH – Appellant
Versus
M R RAJESWARI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:METTU SRINIVAS REDDY,METTU SRINIVAS REDDY ,Respondent Advocate:

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 835 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.204/2020 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY Between:

1. UCO Bank, Patancheru Branch, D.No.12-1, Susheeram Complex, Santhi Nagar, Sanga Reddy-502319, Rep. by its Branch Manager. 2. UCO Bank, Zonal Office, 8-2-624, Ground Floor, Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad- 500 034, Rep. by its Zonal Manager.

………..Appellants/ Opposite Parties And:

1. Smt. M.R. Rajeswari, W/o M.S. Sarveswara Rao, Occ.” Housewife, Aged about 60 years, R/o Flat No.1210, Block-G, Rainbow Vistas @ Rock Garden, Green Hills Road, Moosapet, Hyderabad- 500 018. ………Respondent /Complainant Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Parties : M/s.Mettu Srinivas Reddy Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : M/s. V.Gourisankara Rao.

QUORUM :

HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

TUESDAY, THE 12 th DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********

Order : (PER HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) 1. The appeal is filed u/s 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the Opposite Parties No.1 & 2, having aggrieved by the order, dated 29.09.2023 in CC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top