2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 31606
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
HARPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GMADA – Respondent
SC/4/CC/98/2024
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. SC/4/CC/98/2024 HARPREET SINGH PRESENT ADDRESS - HOUSE NO. 651, SECTOR 33B CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
.......Complainant(s)
Versus GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GMADA PRESENT ADDRESS - PUDA BHAWAN, SECTOR 62, SAS NAGAR,CHANDIGARH. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PRESENT ADDRESS - PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62 SAS NAGAR,CHANDIGARH.
DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED PRESENT ADDRESS - SCO 190-191-192, SECTOR 8C, CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
MANAGING DIRECTOR OF DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED PRESENT ADDRESS - SCO 190-191-192, SECTOR 8C, CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PRESENT ADDRESS - PUDA BHAWAN, SECTOR 62 SAS NAGAR,CHANDIGARH.
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PRESENT ADDRESS - PUDA BHAWAN, SECTOR 62, MOHALI,CHANDIGARH.
.......Opposite Party(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. RAJESH KUMAR ARYA , MEMBER FOR THE COMPLAINANT:
HARPREET SINGH DATED: 14/10/2025
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH
Mr. Harpreet Singh aged about 49 years, son of Sh. Pritam Singh, Resident of House No. 651, Sector 33-B, Chandigarh, bearing Aadhar No. 7779 4996 0078 and using Mobile No. 98721 41069, currently at 13405, Moran Drive, North Potomac, MD 20878, United States of America.
Complaint case No.
:
98 of 2024
Date of Institution
:
10.10.2024
Date of Decision
:
14.10.2025
……Complainant V e r s u s
1. Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), through its Chief Administrator. PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab.
2. The Chief Administrator, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), PUDA Bhawan, Sector
62, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab
3. M/s DLF Universal Limited, through its Managing Director, having its Registered Office at M/s DLF Universal, Shopping Mall, 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, DLF City, Phase-1, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002 India.
4. The Managing Director of M/s DLF Universal Limited, having its Registered Office at M/s DLF Universal, Shopping Mall, 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, DLF City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002 India.
OP No. 3 & 4 also available at SCO No. 190-191-192, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh.
5. Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA), through its Chief Administrator, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab.
6. The Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA), PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, S.A.S.
Nagar, Mohali, Punjab.
…..Opposite parties BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT.
MR.RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER Present:- Sh. Raghav Dayal Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.
Ms. Neetu Singh, & Sh. Shekher Verma, Counsel for OPs No. 1 and 2 (on VC).
Ms. Tanika Goyal, Advocate for opposite parties No. 3 & 4. Opposite parties No. 5 &
6 exparte vide order dated 20.12.2024.
JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT The present complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties for indulging in unfair trade practices and gross deficiency in service in relation to the sale, marketing, and development of a residential plot bearing No. HPE-R1-E105, Block-E, measuring 292.64 sq. mtrs. (350 sq. yards), in the project titled “DLF Hyde Park Estate,” situated at Mullanpur, SAS Nagar, Punjab and as such, has sought following relief:-
i. Order that the OPs develop and construct the 80' wide road facing Plot No. HPE-R1-E105, in Block-E of Hyde Park Estate, New Chandigarh, Mullanpur, SAS Nagar within a time bound manner;
ii. Order that the OPs pay interest @ 12% p.a. on the total paid up amount of the Complainant on a monthly basis until the time the construction of the 80' wide road is completed;
iii. Order that opposite parties no. 3 & 4 are restrained from levying or charging delayed construction fee/ fine/ charge from the Complainant until the 80' wide access road to his plot is completed by them.
iv. The Complainant be granted compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for inconvenience, mental harassment and damages suffere