SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 31669

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MAX BALAJI HOSPITAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. N.R. MISHRA – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 03.03.2015 Date of Hearing: 14.07.2025 Date of Decision: 15.10.2025 FIRST APPEAL NO.-110/2015 IN THE MATTER OF

1. MAX BALAJI HOSPITAL, (A UNIT OF BALAJI MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH CENTRE), 108 A, I.P. EXTENSION, OPPOSITE SANCHAR APARTMENT.

NEW DELHI – 110 092.

2. DR. L. TOMAR, (ORTHOPAEPDIST)

108 A, I.P. EXTENSION, OPPOSITE SANCHAR APARTMENT NEW DELHI – 110 092.

(Through: Mr. Ravindra Aggarwal, Advocate)

…Appellants VERSUS SMT. N. R. MISHRA W/O SHRI M.P. MISHRA, R/O. 653, KANUNGO APARTMENTS, DELHI – 110 092.

(Through: Mr. Biraja Mahapatra, Advocate)

…Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Present: Ms. Shakti Chaturvedi, Counsel for the Appellant appeared through VC Mr. Biraja Mahapatra and Mr. Nalin Hingorani, Counsel for the respondent (Enrl. No. D/696/2001 & D/12389/2022, Mobile:

9810935526, Email: birajamahapatra@gmail.com PER : HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are as under:

“The brief conspectus of facts of the present complaint are that the complainant, ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top