SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. HARSHDEEP SINGH NAT – Appellant
Versus
SUKHUM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD – Respondent
SC/3/CC/28/2023



Petitioner Advocates:HARVINDER SINGH JOHAL,HARVINDER SINGH JOHAL ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

Consumer Complaint No.28 of 2023 Date of Institution : 10.05.2023 Date of Reserve : 28.10.2025 Date of Decision : 11.11.2025

1. Dr.Harshdeep Singh Nat S/o Sh.Avtar Singh temporary resident of 225, Devonshire Lane, Madison, CT 06443 and permanent resident of House No.72, Sector 19-A, Chandigarh-160019.

Email Id: harshdeep.nat@gmail.com.

2. Mrs.Rosy Nat, W/o Mr.Harshdeep Singh Nat temporary resident of 225, Devonshire Lane, Madison, CT 06443 and permanent resident of House No.72, Sector 19-A, Chandigarh-160019.

Email Id: harshdeep.nat@gmail.com.

….….Complainants Versus

1. Sukhm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Yellow Stone Landmark Infocity, Sector 66 A, SAS Nagar-160062.

Email Id: Sales@aeropolis.city.

2. Tejinder Singh Bhatia, Director Aeropolis Infrastructure Pvt.

Ltd., Registered Address at Flat No.1272, Silverstone Cooperative House Building Society, Sector 48 B, Chandigarh- 160047 with present address Aeropolis City, Sector 66A, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.

Email id: Sales@aeropolis.city.

……Opposite parties Consumer Complaint under Section 47 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Quorum:-

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member Mr. Vishav Kant Garg, Member

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Present :-

For the Complainant : Ms.Tajinder Kaur Johal, Advocate For the OPs : Ms.Heena Singh, Advocate SIMARJOT KAUR, MEMBER The Complaint has been filed by the Complainants-

Dr.Harshdeep Singh Nat and Mrs.Rosy Nat under Section 47 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short "the Act") against the OPs-Sukhm Infra. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., mentioning therein that the Complainants wanted to purchase a commercial property jointly to earn their livelihood. They wanted to set up a business in Mohali. For the said purpose they came across a commercial retail SCO in the integrated IT Township. The name of Firm of the OPs was "Yellowstone Landmark Infocity", Sector 66-A, SAS Nagar, District Mohali, Punjab. They had approached the OPs for buying the property. It has been mentioned in the Complaint that the letter of allotment was given to the Complainants by "Yellowstone Builders Pvt. Ltd" on 19.11.2015 after paying an amount of Rs.62,61,838/- and had submitted Application Form for the same. Ex.C-1 is the letter of Allotment. Ex.C-2 is the receipt of payment deposited with the OPs. A buyer seller agreement was executed on 29.04.2017 between Sukhm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., its associate Company Yellowstone Builders Private Infrastructure. The Corporate Office of the OPs was at Site Office, Yellowstone Landmark Infocity, Sector-66A, Mohali. The signatories to the said Agreement were the Authorized Representative Sh.Tejinder Singh Bhatia of OPs and the Complainants. Ex.C-3 is the Buyer Seller agreement.

2. It has been averred in the Complaint that the sellers had promised to give the possession of the SCO plot within a period of 12-15 months on execution of Conveyance Deed. The OPs were to obtain Partial/Completion Certificate. The Complainants had already paid an amount of Rs.1,71,46,500/-. The possession of the said plot had not been handed over to them despite the lapse of more than 4 years from the date of signing of the Agreement. Ex.C-4 is the record of the payment.

3. It has further been alleged that the initial Agreement was signed with Yellow Stone landmark Infocity. The said Firm was subsequently merged into Sukhm Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd and then with Aeropolis Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Therefore a new entity was formed in the name of Aeropolis Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., which is handling the said project at present. The Complainants were left with no other option but to file the case before RERA bearing the Complaint GC No. 1749/2020. In the final order given by RERA, it was held that the builders had to pay the Com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top