STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PREM SINGH vs
ORDER
MR. PREM SINGH VS. M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR.
09.09.2025 Present: Ms. Raveena Paniker, Counsel for the Complainant/ Applicant.
None for the OP.
MA-70/2025 in CC/946/2017 Vide this order we shall dispose off the Application filed by the Applicant/Complainant seeking restoration of the Complaint case No. 946/2017 which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 02.05.2024.
The Applicant submitted that the present Complaint was initially filed before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gurugram which was dismissed as withdrawn before the said Commission on the ground of lack of pecuniary jurisdiction. Thereafter, the present Complaint bearing no. 946/2017 was filed before this Commission and the present matter was at the stage of final arguments when the same was dismissed for non-prosecution on 02.05.2024. The Applicant further submitted that the non-appearance was attributable to the negligence of the previously engaged counsel who failed to appear before this Commission. The Applicant has further relied upon the following judgments in support of his case:
a) Rafiq & Anr. Vs. Munshilal & Anr. [(1981) 2 SCC 788];
b) Secretary, Department of H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.