SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 32616

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PREM SINGH vs


Petitioner Advocates:PSP LEGAL ,Respondent Advocate:

ORDER

MR. PREM SINGH VS. M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR.

09.09.2025 Present: Ms. Raveena Paniker, Counsel for the Complainant/ Applicant.

None for the OP.

MA-70/2025 in CC/946/2017 Vide this order we shall dispose off the Application filed by the Applicant/Complainant seeking restoration of the Complaint case No. 946/2017 which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 02.05.2024.

The Applicant submitted that the present Complaint was initially filed before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gurugram which was dismissed as withdrawn before the said Commission on the ground of lack of pecuniary jurisdiction. Thereafter, the present Complaint bearing no. 946/2017 was filed before this Commission and the present matter was at the stage of final arguments when the same was dismissed for non-prosecution on 02.05.2024. The Applicant further submitted that the non-appearance was attributable to the negligence of the previously engaged counsel who failed to appear before this Commission. The Applicant has further relied upon the following judgments in support of his case:

a) Rafiq & Anr. Vs. Munshilal & Anr. [(1981) 2 SCC 788];

b) Secretary, Department of H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top