STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PROMILA MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
DDA – Respondent
IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 03.03.2024 Date of hearing: 12.09.2025 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 261/2024 IN THE MATTER OF:
1. MS. PROMILA MAHAJAN, 214D, IDEAL APARTMENT, NASIRPUR DWARKA, OPP. NASIRPUR SUBZI MANDI, NEW DELHI – 110045.
THROUGH ASHWANI KUMAR MAHAJAN HUSBAND OF THE APPELLANT.
2. MR. RAVI GROVER, 214D, IDEAL APARTMENT, NASIRPUR DWARKA, OPP. NASIRPUR SUBZI MANDI, NEW DELHI – 110045. .... Appellants in Person VERSUS
1. VICE CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023.
2. DY DIRECTOR (MIG)/ DDA, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023.
3. DY DIRECTOR (GH) DDA, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023. (Through: Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocate)
....Respondents CORAM:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)
HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present: Mr. A.K. Mahajan, Husband of the appellant.
Adv Mayank Bamniyal, counsel for the Respondent (Email:
bamniyal.mayank@gmail.com) appeared through VC.
PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGMENT
1. The facts of the case necessary as per the District Commission record are:
“1. The Complainant has filed the complaint under sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.