SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 33020

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PROMILA MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
DDA – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 03.03.2024 Date of hearing: 12.09.2025 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 261/2024 IN THE MATTER OF:

1. MS. PROMILA MAHAJAN, 214D, IDEAL APARTMENT, NASIRPUR DWARKA, OPP. NASIRPUR SUBZI MANDI, NEW DELHI – 110045.

THROUGH ASHWANI KUMAR MAHAJAN HUSBAND OF THE APPELLANT.

2. MR. RAVI GROVER, 214D, IDEAL APARTMENT, NASIRPUR DWARKA, OPP. NASIRPUR SUBZI MANDI, NEW DELHI – 110045. .... Appellants in Person VERSUS

1. VICE CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023.

2. DY DIRECTOR (MIG)/ DDA, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023.

3. DY DIRECTOR (GH) DDA, VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023. (Through: Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocate)

....Respondents CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Present: Mr. A.K. Mahajan, Husband of the appellant.

Adv Mayank Bamniyal, counsel for the Respondent (Email:

bamniyal.mayank@gmail.com) appeared through VC.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case necessary as per the District Commission record are:

“1. The Complainant has filed the complaint under sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top