SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 33213

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFROMATION – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH – Respondent


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MADHYA PRADESH FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/23/FA/13/1981 CENTRAL PUBLIC INFROMATION PRESENT ADDRESS - NULL,MADHYA PRADESH.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus SUBHASH PRESENT ADDRESS - NULL,MADHYA PRADESH.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MRS. DR. MONIKA MALIK , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

CENTRAL PUBLIC INFROMATION FOR THE RESPONDENT:

SUBHASH DATED: 26/09/2025

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1981 OF 2013 (Arising out of order dated 20.08.2013 passed in C.C.No. 145/2012 by District Commission, Burhanpur)

CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AND DEPUTY MANAGER (ESTT & ADMN)

NEPA LIMITED, REGD. OFFICE-NEPA NAGAR, TEHSIL-NEPA NAGAR, DISTRICT-BURHANPUR (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus SUBHASH SAPKALE, S/O SHRI TRIYAMBAK SAPKALE, R/O PLOT NO.90, WARD NO.21, TEHSIL-NEPA NAGAR, DISTRICT-BURHANPUR (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

BEFORE :

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV : PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK : MEMBER COUNSEL FOR PARTIES :

Shri Vijay Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

O R D E R

(Passed On 26.09.2025)

Per Say Justice Sunita Yadav, Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top