SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 33523

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CALETAL REALTY PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
MADHU V.N – Respondent


1. Madhu V.N., A-204, Kesav Srushti C.H.S., New Link Road, Chincholi, Malad Dely, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 064

2. Lekha Madhu Nair, A-204, Kesav Srushti C.H.S., New Link Road, Chincholi, Malad Dely, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 064

3. Deepak Madhu Nair, A-204, Kesav Srushti C.H.S., New Link Road, Chincholi, Malad Dely, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 064 (by Adv. V.R. Swaminathan)

O R D E R

HON’BLE JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT The revision petitioners are the opposite parties in C.C.No.798/2024 on the files of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thrissur (for short, ‘the District Commission’).

2. The complainants filed a complaint before the District Commission alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice against the opposite parties in connection with the construction of a villa. During the pendency of the complaint before the District Commission, the complainants filed I.A.No.296/2025, praying for permitting the complainants to complete the construction. The District Commission, as per order dated 04.06.2025, allowed I.A.No.296/2025, against which this revision petition has been filed.

3. Heard both sides. Perused the records.

4. It is not disputed that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top