STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mrs. Padma Pandey, Mr. Rajesh K. Arya, JJ
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Anujit Kaur – Respondent
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH [ADDITIONAL BENCH]
Revision Petition No. : 11 of 2025 Date of Institution : 18.07.2025 Date of Decision : 02.12.2025
1] State Bank of India through its Regional Manager, Local Head Office, Sector 17, Chandigarh.
2] State Bank of India through its Branch Manager, Sector
10, Chandigarh.
…….Petitioners/opposite parties Versus Anujit Kaur (aged 62 years) W/o Sh. Kanwar Iqbal Singh, Resident of House No.62, Sector 10-A, Chandigarh through her Attorney Kanwar Iqbal Singh (Aged 63 years), Resident of House No.62, Sector 10-A, Chandigarh.
……Respondent/complainant BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER Mr. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER Argued by:
Sh. Sumit Narang, Advocate for the petitioners/opposite parties Ms. Neha Matharoo, Advocate for the respondent/complainant –
on voice call PER PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER Instant revision petition has been filed by the opposite parties (petitioners herein) against order dated 04.04.2025 rendered by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh (for brevity hereinafter to be referred as the “District Commission”) in Consumer Complaint bearing No.49 of 2025, whereby the Dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.