SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 33870

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VIJAY DASHRATH NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
WOCKHARDT HOSPITAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:VILASH WAGH ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI Appeal No.A/11/771 (Arising out of order dated 30/06/2011 passed by the D.F. Nasik in CC/10/209)

Mr.Vijay Dashrath Naidu R/o.Flat no.2 Sheetal Vihar Near Unmesh Hall Dr.Bhabhanagar, Nasik .....Appellant/Org.complainant District Nasik Versus

1.Wockhardt Hospitals Wani House, Near Wadala Naka Mumbai Agra Road, Nasik Taluka & District Nasik 2.Dr.Abhijit Machnurkar

3.Dr.Mukesh More

4.Dr.D.S.Wagh ………Respondents/org.OPs

5.Dr.P.D.Shinde Respondent nos.2 to 5 r/o. Wockhardt Hospitals Wani House, Near Wadala Naka Mumbai Agra Road, Nasik Taluka & District Nasik BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member Appellant present along with Advocate Jayesh Jain.

PRESENT:

Advocate Geeta Handa Khanuja for respondents FINAL ORDER (Dt.17/07/2025)

Per Hon’ble Vijay C.Premchandani – Member SUMMARY OF APPEAL MEMO Facts of the Case:

1. This appeal arises out of a complaint filed by the complainant (father of the deceased patient) alleging gross medical negligence and deficiency in service by the respondent hospital and its doctors, leading to the untimely death of his son. The son was a young boy, who had been admitted to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top