SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 33975

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MULCHAND BATHARE – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA KUMAR SONI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SHIVAM KUMAR SINGH ,Respondent Advocate:

M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)

APPEAL NO. 595/2024 Moolchand Batre S/o Heeralal Batre R/o Sanjay Nagar Gwaltoli Hoshangabad (M.P.) ... Appellant VERSUS.

Narendra Kumar Soni S/o Rewati Prasad Soni R/o Vaidik Vihar Colony Babai Road Hoshangabad (M.P.) – 461 001 … Respondent BEFORE;

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. SRIKANT PANDEY, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:

SHRI AKASH SAHU, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT.

NONE FOR RESPONDENT.

O R D E R

( 23.07.2025 )

Per say - Justice Sunita Yadav, President.

This appeal by the appellant/complainant (hereinafter referred to ‘complainant’) is directed against the order dated 18.12.2023, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Narmadapuram (for short ‘District Commission’), in complaint case No.69/2019, filed by him. Briefly put, the facts of the case, as narrated by the complainant, are that on 7.6.2018, he executed an agreement with the opposite party, according to which, within six months from the date of execution of agreement the opposite party will complete construction of a house in the plot of complainant, admeasuring 1000 sq. ft., situated in Tulsidh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top