SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 34053

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR LINGONG INDIA PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR SOUTHERN GRANITES INDUSTRIES LTD – Respondent
SC/32/RP/81/2022



Petitioner Advocates:BABY AUGUSTINE ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KERALA REVISION PETITION NO. SC/32/RP/81/2022 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR LINGONG INDIA PVT LTD PRESENT ADDRESS - PLOT NO 163 SECTOR 3 PITHAMPUR DHAR MADHYAPRADESH ,KERALA.

.......Petitioner(s)

Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR SOUTHERN GRANITES INDUSTRIES LTD PRESENT ADDRESS - CHERUKKULANJI P O JANDAYIKKAL RANNI ,KERALA.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER FOR THE PETITIONER:

NEMO FOR THE RESPONDENT:

NEMO DATED: 28/07/2025

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVISION PETTITION No.81/2022 ORDER DATED: 28.07.2025 (Against the order in I.A. No. 98/2021 in C.C.No.100/2021 on the files of DCDRC, Pathanamthitta)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA : PRESIDENT KUMAR SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER REVISION PETITIONERS:

1. The Managing Director, Lingong India Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.163, Sector

3, Pithampur, Dhar, Madhya Pradesh

2. The Manager, Track Line Heavy Equipments, Moovattupuzha (by Adv. Czijy Chacko and Adv. Baby Augustine)

Vs.

RESPONDENTS:

1. Southern Granites Industries Ltd. represented by Managing Director, K.J. Thomas Kutty, Cherukkulanji P.O., Jandayikkal, Ranni

2. The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Micro Office, Ranni (by Adv. Sreevaraham G. Satheesh for R2)

O R D E R

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B.SUDHEENDRAKUMAR : PRESIDENT The revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in view of the endorsement made in this regard by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners on the memorandum of revision petition. However, this order will not stand in the way of the revision petitioners in filing appropriate application before the District Commission seeking for removing them from the party array. If any such application is filed after serving copy to the other side, the District Commission shall consider and dispose of the said application, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within two weeks from the date of filing the application.

JUSTICE B. SUDHEENDRA : PRESIDENT KUMAR AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER SL/jb ..................

SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR PRESIDENT ..................

SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER ..................J SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top