SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 53

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AAKASH GOEL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER SPORTS DDA – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 12.06.2024 Date of Hearing: 01.12.2025 Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 430/2024 IN THE MATTER OF AKASH GOEL

393, SFS FLATS ASHOK VIHAR, PHASE-4 NEW DELHI 110052 (Appellant in person )

Versus COMMISSIONER (SPORTS)

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPORTS WING, COORDINATION CELL, SIRI FORT SPORTS COMPLEX, AUGUST KRANTI MARG DELHI 110049 (Through: Ms. Mansi Bajaj, Advocate)

……Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Appellant in person Mr. Saatvik Khurana, proxy counsel for Ms. Mansi Bajaj, counsel for the respondent. (Enrl. No. D/9208/2023, Ph. No. 9818000003, e-mail id –

mansi.bajaj@mblegalassociates)

PER :HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are as under:

“Briefly, the complainant applied to OP/DDA to add name of his wife as dependent member in respect of sport complex and facility, the complainant was asked for marriage registration certificate (of marriage on 22.11.2023), it was also provided. However, the application was not accepted by OP/DD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top