SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 60

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE – Appellant
Versus
PARTHO DAS & ANR. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:HEMANT PAYAK ,Respondent Advocate:

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 06.06.2018 Date of Hearing: 31.10.2025 Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO.-272/2018 IN THE MATTER OF PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, (ERSTWHILE ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE), (THROUGH ITS MANAGER/A.R.), JASOLA BRANCH, JASOLA, NEW DELHI – 110025.

(Through: Mr. Hemant Payak, Advocate)

...Appellant VERSUS

1. MR. PARTHO DAS, R/O HOUSE NO. 38 E, POCKET – 10 B, DDA LIG FLAT, JASOLA, NEW DELHI – 110025.

2. PUNJAB & SIND BANK, THROUGH ITS MANAGER /AR, BRANCH AT H BLOCK MARKET, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI.

(Through: Ms. Jyoti Rajshree, Advocate)

…Respondents CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. PINKI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Present: Mr. Hemant Payak, Counsel for the Appellant.

None for the Respondent.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are as under:

“Briefly stated facts of the case are that the complainant has a joint account with OP-1 since 23.01.2015 along with his wife for which he held an ATM card issued by OP-1. Annexure-1 is the copy of the passbook & ATM card.

The Complainant states that he had gone to Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top