SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 92

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MANOHAR LAL SEHGAL – Appellant
Versus
JALANDHAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:AMIT KUMAR SHARMA ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

Date of institution : 16.05.2023 Reserved on : 12.12.2025 Date of Decision : 05.01.2026 Manohar Lal Sehgal aged 74 years s/o Sh.Balwant Rai R/o H.No.453, Shastri Nagar, J.P.Nagar, P.O.Basti Guzan, Jalandhar.

….Appellant/Complainant.

Versus Jalandhar Improvement Trust, Model Town Road, Jalandhar City through its Executive Officer.

….…Respondent/Opposite Party First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 27.09.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jalandhar in CC No.291 of 2020.

Quorum:-

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Yes/No Present:-

For the appellant : Sh.Shubham Gupta, Advocate for Ms.Harleen Kaur, Advocate with Sh.Manohar Lal Sehgal, in person For the respondent : Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate SIMARJOT KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER :

The Appellant/Complainant has filed the present Appeal to challenge the impugned order dated 27.09.2022 pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top