STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THAKUR ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
MANISHA VIJAY SALUNKE – Respondent
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI Misc.Application No.MA/23/297 in SC/27/A/23/520 M/s.Thakur Enterprises A Proprietary concern O/a: 403, Hillview Apartment, Lokmanya Nagar Pada No.-4, Thane – 400606.
Through Proprietor Mr.Digambar V.Thakur ........Appellant V/s.
Mrs.Manisha Vijay Salunke R/a : C1/504, Harasiddh Park, Pokharam Road No.-2, Pawar Nagar, Thane West. ........Respondent BEFORE:
Justice Mr.S.P. Tavade, Hon’ble President Mr.Mukesh V.Sharma, Hon’ble Member For Applicant : Adv.Manvi Sharma For Respondent : Adv.Poonam Makhijani
ORDER
(07th January, 2026)
Per: MR.MUKESH V. SHARMA, HON’BLE MEMBER
1. The Appellant has preferred the present First Appeal challenging
the order dated 28/11/2022 passed by the Ld. District Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission/Forum, Thane in Consumer
Complaint No. 446 of 2018, along with the appeal, the Appellant has moved the present Application seeking condonation of delay.
2. As per the Appellant, copy of the impugned order was received on 30/12/2022 and there is a delay of 115 days in filing the appeal.
The Appellant prayed that the said delay be condoned.
3. The Appellant has stated that after receiving t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.