SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 268

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW INDIA ASSUAANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S SARC PRINTLINE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:DR D N SINGAL ,Respondent Advocate:

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 04.11.2024 Date of Hearing: 13.11.2025 Date of Decision: 09.01.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO. 720/2024 IN THE MATTER OF NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., BOMBAY LIFE BUILDING, N-34, CONNAUGHT CIRCUS, NEW DELHI–110001.

(Through: Mr. D. N. Singh, Advocate)

…Appellant VERSUS M/S. SARC PRINTLINE, 208/6F, SHAHZADA BAGH, DAYA BASTI, NEW DELHI–110052.

(Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate)

…Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Mr. D. N. Singh, Counsel for the Appellant, E-mail:

dnsingal1951@gmail.com.

Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, counsel for the Respondent, E-mail:

siddharth95899@gmail.com.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The present Appeal is preferred by the Appellant against the Impugned Order dated

31.08.2024., passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I (North District) [Govt. of NCT of Delhi] Ground Floor, Court Annexe-2, Tis Hazari Court Complex, Delhi-110054 titled M/s. SARC Printline vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. in CC No. 71 of 2023.

2. The District Commission after taking into conside

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top