SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 301

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
SANGITA SAMBHAJI VARUNGALE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PATIL VAIBHAV RAMESH ,Respondent Advocate:

Date of filing :14.02.2024 Date of order :12.01.2026 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

REVISION PETITION NO. : 22 OF 2024 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 85 OF 2023 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION : AURANGABAD. S Bank of Maharashtra, Branch Manager, Branch Kacheri road, Juna Jalna, Tq. and Dist. Jalna, Zonal Office Cidco, Aurangabad.

VERSUS

1. Sangita Sambhaji Varungale R/o Yashwant Nagar, Jalna, At present C/o Pramod Patil, Flat NO. 201, Elite Qube Residency, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad.

2. Cholamandalam M S General Insurance Company Ltd,.

Through Branch Manager, Rokadiya Hanuman Colony, Near Mondha Naka, Jalna road, Aurangabad.

Present :- Adv.V.R.Patil for the Rev. Petitioner.

Adv.R.V.Jadhav for respondent no.1.

Respondent no.2 Ex-parte.

CORAM : Milind.S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

Nagesh C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.

J U D G M E N T

(Delivered on 12/01/2026)

Per Mr.Nagesh C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.

1. This revision petition has been preferred under Section 47 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (in short, the C.P.A.) against the “No Written Statement (No.W.S. in short.)” order dated 10.01.2024 passed by the District Commission Aurangabad, (“Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top