SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 314

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sri.C.A.Abdulla. – Appellant
Versus
Sri. Vijaya Kumar – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:B E Somalokanatha ,Respondent Advocate: Svd(P.P)

Date of filing: 3O.O8,2022 Date of Disposal: 12.01.2026 (PRTNCTPAL BENCH)

th D TED: L2 DAy FJ NUA Y2026 CORAM: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTTCE T.G.SHMSHANKARE GOWDA _ PRESTDENT and HON,BLE MTs. DIWASHREE M - LADY MEMBER tAtL78tt2022 sct29 BETWEEN:

Sri.C.A.Abdulla S/o Late Ali, Aged 77 years, R/o Gonikoppal Road, Virajpet Town, S.Kodagu - 57 L2t8. ........ Appeilant/s (By Sri.B.E.Somalokanatha, Advocate)

AND:

Sri.Vijaya Kumar S/o Guruswamy Aged 30 years, Building Contractor Gandhinagar, Virajpet Town, S.Kodagu-571218. Respondent,/s (Served - Absent)

ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE T.c. SHMSHANKARE GOWDA, PRESIDENT)

This Appeal is filed U/s.4t of Consumer protection Act, 2019 (in short CP Act) by the Appellant challenging .

the order dated:30.07.2022 passed in CC/2/2020 on the file of Kodagu District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (in short the District Commission).

2. The Appellant was the Complainant and Respondent was the Opposite party (in short Op) before the District Commission. The Rank of the parties shall be referred to as per their status before the District Commission.

3.

The Brief facts of the case are that:

The Complainant is the owner of the land bearing sy.no.10/3 and 72/2 situ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top