SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 334

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
SANJOG VINODLAL MUTHA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:J K NARAYANE ,Respondent Advocate:

Date of filing :07.12.2018 Date of order :13.01.2026 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

FIRST APPEAL NO. : 571 OF 2018 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 204 OF 2015 DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM : AHMEDNAGAR.

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., Appellant Through its Divisional Manager, (Adv.J.K.Narayane)

D.O.No.II, Adalat Road, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.

VERSUS

1. Sanjog Vinodlal Mutha, Respondent No.1 and 2 R/o Barde Galli, Ahmednagar. (Adv.Pratik P.Kothari)

2. Vinodlal Zumberlal Mutha, R/o Barde Galli, Ahmednagar.

3. M.D.India Health Care Services Pvt.Ltd. Respondent No.3 R/o M.D.India, 147/8, Near Kothruad (Not proceeded with)

Petrol Pump, Karve Statue Circle, Kothrud, Pune-411 038, Present Address, Survey No.46/1, E-Space, A2 Building, 3rd Floor, Pune Nagar Road, Wadgaon Sheri, Pune 411 014.

CORAM : Milind S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

Nagesh C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member

J U D G M E N T

(Delivered on 13.01.2026)

Per Milind S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

This is an appeal challenging correctness and legality of the judgment and order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahmadnagar (the ‘District Commission’ for shr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top