SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 381

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHANDRAKALA D C – Appellant
Versus
BRANCH MANAER – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:,Respondent Advocate: svd absent

Appeal filed on: O9-O8-2O24 Appeal disposed on: 14-0l-2026 BEFORE THE KARNATAXA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE. (ADDL. BENCH}

DATED THIS THE l4th DAY OF JANUARY,20.26 CORAM:

HoN'BLE sRr.RAvI SHANKA& JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE SMT. SUNITA C.BAGEWADI, LADY EMBER APPEAL No.235412024 Chandrakala.D.C, Aged 49 years, W/o late J.Raju, No.2, Town Planning Layout, Near Sharadadevi ...Appellant/s Nagar Circle, Mysuru-570 009 (In person) -Versus-

Branch Manager, M/s. United lndia insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office- 1, Devaraja Mansion ...Respondent/s Prince of Wales Road, Chamarajapuram, Mysuru-570 004 (Notlce seroed- Absent)

ORDER BY SRI RAVI SHAN!iAR. JUDICIAL MEMBER The Appellant,/ Complainant preferred this Appeal against the dismissal order passed by the District Consumer Commission and submits that her husband was the owner of the Honda Motorcycle bearing Reg.No.KA-09-JF-4057 while he was driving on 6.2.2023 met an accident and suffered head injury, consequently succumbed to the injuries on 12.2.2023. The husband of the complainant had also obtained insurance policy to the said vehicle. The complainant after death of her husband being nominee and beneficiary ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top