SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 387

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RANDEEP SINGH SISODIA – Appellant
Versus
M/S BPTP RESORT PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:DEVINDER KUMAR ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH [ADDITIONAL BENCH]

Consumer Complaint No. : 106 of 2024 Date of Institution : 26.11.2024 Date of Decision : 15.01.2026 Sh. Randeep Singh Sisodia son of Sh. Ranbir Singh, aged about 56 years, presently residing at House No.743, Sector 22-A, Chandigarh.

……. Complainant Versus

1. M/s BPTP Resort Private Limited, Registered office: OT-14, 3rd Floor, Next Door, Parklands, Sector-76, Faridabad (Haryana)-121004 through its Managing Director

2. M/s BPTP Resort Private Limited, M-11, Middle Circle, Connaught Circus, New Delhi 110001 through its Director.

…Opposite Parties BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER MR. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER ARGUED BY :-

Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate for the complainant Sh. Hemant Saini, Advocate for the opposite parties PER PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER Briefly stated the case of the complainant is that the opposite parties, through advertisements and assurances, launched a residential project namely “THE RESORT” at BPTP Parklands, Sector-75, Faridabad, Haryana, on the basis of which the complainant, who was residing in a rented accommodation and intended to purchase a flat for his personal use, book

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top