SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 390

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SHRI YOGENDRA KHARE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:NARESH KHANNA ,Respondent Advocate:

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 05.11.2024 Date of hearing: 24.11.2025 Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 754/2024 IN THE MATTER OF:

1. M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD., 2. MR. VIRENDER VERMA, DIRECTOR, BOTH HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT:

2, PALMS APARTMENTS, PLOT NO.13-B, SECTOR-6, DWARKA, NEW DELHI – 110075. (Through: Naresh Khanna & Co.)

.... Appellants VERSUS MR. YOGENDRA KHARE, S/O MR. VIJAY KUMAR KHARE, R/O C-8, HOUSE NO. 8826, VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI – 110070.

(Through: Mr. Devansh Agarwal, Advocate)

....Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Mr. G. L. N. Murthy, counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Devansh Agarwal, counsel for the respondent alongwith the SPA holder.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL,PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case necessary as per the District Commission record are:

“1. The brief facts of the case are that OP-1 is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 whereas the OP-2 is the director of OP-1 and has been responsible for the day to day affairs of the company. The complainant has booked a space unit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top