STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SHRI YOGENDRA KHARE – Respondent
IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 05.11.2024 Date of hearing: 24.11.2025 Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 754/2024 IN THE MATTER OF:
1. M/S PAREENA INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD., 2. MR. VIRENDER VERMA, DIRECTOR, BOTH HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT:
2, PALMS APARTMENTS, PLOT NO.13-B, SECTOR-6, DWARKA, NEW DELHI – 110075. (Through: Naresh Khanna & Co.)
.... Appellants VERSUS MR. YOGENDRA KHARE, S/O MR. VIJAY KUMAR KHARE, R/O C-8, HOUSE NO. 8826, VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI – 110070.
(Through: Mr. Devansh Agarwal, Advocate)
....Respondent CORAM:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)
HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)
Present: Mr. G. L. N. Murthy, counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Devansh Agarwal, counsel for the respondent alongwith the SPA holder.
PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL,PRESIDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The facts of the case necessary as per the District Commission record are:
“1. The brief facts of the case are that OP-1 is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 whereas the OP-2 is the director of OP-1 and has been responsible for the day to day affairs of the company. The complainant has booked a space unit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.