STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION U.T., CHANDIGARH [ADDITIONAL BENCH]

Appeal No. : 122 of 2025 Date of Institution : 07.03.2025 Date of Decision : 19.01.2026

1] Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector

62, SAS Nagar, Punjab through its Chief Administrator.

2] Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector

62, SAS Nagar, Punjab through its Estate Officer (IT City)

….Appellants/Opposite Parties Versus Punam Sharma, aged about 50 years, wife of Manoj Kumar Sharma R/o House No.3094, 2nd Floor, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh ….Respondent/Complainant BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER SH. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER ARGUED BY :-

Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants Sh. N. P. Sharma, Advocate (on VC) alongwith Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for he respondent/complainant PER RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER The instant appeal has been filed by the opposite parties -

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) (appellants herein) for setting aside order dated 18.01.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as ‘District Commission’) vide which, Consumer Complaint bearing No.164