SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 486

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SMT.KRISHNA NAGAR – Appellant
Versus
DR.PRAMOD SHARMA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SH.V.K.SAXENA ,Respondent Advocate:

M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)

APPEAL NO. 408/2022 Smt. Krishna W/o Suresh Kumar Nagar R/o House No.14, Limbodi District Indore (M.P.) ... Appellant VERSUS.

1. Dr Pramod Sharma R/o 09, Vishnupuri Bhavarkua Chouraha Medisquare Hospital A.B. Road, Indore (M.P.)

2. Dr. Geeta Sharma R/o 09, Vishnupuri Bhavarkua Chouraha Medisquare Hospital A.B. Road, Indore (M.P.) ... Respondents BEFORE;

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:

SHRI VIVEK ANAND NEMA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT. SHRI DEEPESH JOSHI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS.

O R D E R

( 20.01.2026 )

The following order of the Bench was delivered by Dr.

Monika Malik, Member.

This appeal by the appellant/complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) is directed against the order dated 18.4.2022, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission No.1, Indore (for short ‘District Commission’), in complaint case No. 626/2014, whereby the District Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by her.

2. Case of the complainant is such that she observed pain in her abdomen and had therefore, shown to the opposit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top