STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/4/FA/298/2025 (Against the Order dated 21st August 2025 in Complaint DC/AB1/44/CC/698/2020 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh district commission)

JAGTAR SINGH S/o. Bachan singh PRESENT ADDRESS - 762 GROUND FLOOR , NEW CHANDIGARH , OMAXE CASSIA , S.A.S NAGAR,PUNJAB.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. Through its Director PRESENT ADDRESS - REGIONAL OFFICE SCO NO. 143-144SECTOR 8-C , CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.

PERMANENT ADDRESS - 10, LSCKALKAJI , NEW DELHI,DELHI.

BUSINESS ADDRESS - PLOT NO. 23VILLAGE CHAHHAR MAJRA, MULLANPUR , S.A.S NAGAR,PUNJAB. .......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. PREETINDER SINGH , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

JAGTAR SINGH S/o. Bachan singh DATED: 21/01/2026

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH U.T., CHANDIGARH U.T., CHANDIGARH U.T., CHANDIGARH Jagtar Singh, aged 62 years, son of Sh.Bachan Singh, R/o Ward No.5, Street No.2, New Suraj Nagri, Abohar, Fazilka, Punjab. As mentioned in the complaint Presently residing at Flat No.762, Ground Floor, Omaxe Cassia, New Chandigarh, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab-160014 ……Appellant/Complainant V e r s u s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office SCO No.143- 144, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh.

Fresh Address: Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.23, Village Chahhar Majra, Mullanpur, New Chandigarh-140901 through its Director Rohtas Goel.

Corporate Office Address:- Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., 10 LSC, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019.

…..Respondent/opposite party BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT.

MR.PREETINDER SINGH, MEMBER Present:- Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.

Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

PER JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT The complainant (appellant in this appeal) by way of filing this appeal is seeking modification of the relief already awarded to him, vide order dated 21.08.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T., Chandigarh (in short the District Commission), in consumer complaint bearing no.698 of 2020. Following relief has already been granted by the District Commission while allowing the said consumer complaint:-

“…12] In view of the above discussion, the complaint of the complainant is partly allowed and the opposite party is directed as under:-

i) To pay Rs.4,24,925/- to the complainant (i.e. compensation @ Rs.10/- per sq.ft. per month for the super area 1725 sq.ft i.e. Rs.17250/- per month for the delayed period of 24 months

19 days with effect from 30.12.2014 to 18.01.2017).

ii) To pay Rs.10,000/- to the complainant as compensation for the harassment caused as well as litigation expenses.

The above said order shall be complied with by the opposite party within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

13] The pending application(s) if any, stands disposed of accordingly.…”

2. Before the District Commission it was the case of the complainant that one Mamta Shelke had booked an independent ground floor unit in the project of the opposite party, namely “Omaxe Cassia”, by paying a sum of Rs.8 lakhs inclusive of taxes on 01.03.2011. As per the receipt dated 01.03.2011 issued by the opposite party (Exhibit C-1), the property was described as OCIF/P/1725/327. After about nine months, the opposite party had issued a provisional allotment letter dated 23.12.2011 (Exhibit C-2), provisionally allotting an independent floor on plot No.762/GF admeasuring approximately 300 sq. yards with a built-up area of 1725 sq.ft., as per the tentative layout plan. Subsequently, on 29.12.2012, an Allotment Letter for Residential Independent Floor in Cassia within the Residential Township Project “Omaxe New Chandigarh” (Exhibit C-3) was executed between the opposite party and Ms. Mamta Shelke. The basic cost of the uni