SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 584

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RAJENDER SINGH CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. & ANR. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ARUN DHIMAN ,Respondent Advocate:

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 21.01.2020 Date of Hearing: 18.12.2025 Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 COMPLAINT CASE NO- 40/2020 IN THE MATTER OF MR. RAJENDER SINGH CHAUHAN, S/O MR. RAM LAL, R/O D-280, NAWADA HOUSING COMPLEX, KAKROLA MORE, NEW DELHI – 110059.

.

(Through: G. L. X. Law Officers)

…Complainant VERSUS M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD., THOURGH ITS DIRECTOR, REGISTERED & CORPORATE OFFICE AT:

6TH FLOOR, ARUNACHAL BUILDING, 19- BARAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110001.

(Through: KNM & Partners, Law Offices)

…Opposite Party CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Mr. Arush Dogra, Counsel for the complainant appeared through VC Mr. T. P. Chauhan and Ms. Tanvi Garg, Counsel for the OP (Email: tgarg@knm.in)

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

JUDGMENT

1. The present complaint has been filed by the Complainant before this commission alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice by the Opposite Party and has prayed the following reliefs:

A. To hand over the possession of the flat to the complainant as soon as possible.

B. Direct the OP to receive the balance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top