STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ANITA RAJKAMAL BANKAR – Appellant
Versus
M/S.JAIKA MOTORS LTD – Respondent
SC/CB2/27/A/21/2016
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CIRCUIT BENCH NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/CB2/27/A/463/2015
BRANCH MANAGER JAIKA MOTORS LTD. .......Appellant(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - MIDC GROWTH SEPT. PLOT NO. X-2X-3X-4 TA
Versus
ANITA RAJKAMAL BANKAR .......Respondent(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - R/O JATPURA WARD, NEAR HANUMAN MAND
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/CB2/27/A/21/2016
ANITA RAJKAMAL BANKAR .......Appellant(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - R/O.JATPURA WARD,NEAR HANUMAN MAND
Versus
M/S.JAIKA MOTORS LTD .......Respondent(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - MIDC GROWTH SEPT,PLOT NO.X-2,X-3,X-4,TA
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MRS. KALYANI KAPSE , PRESIDING MEMBER
HON'BLE MS. SHAILA D. WANDHARE , MEMBER
FOR THE ADV. JOHARAPURKAR FOR THE APPELLANT /ORG. O.P. IN APPEAL NO.
APPELLANT: 463/2015 AND ADV. AGRAWAL FOR THE APPELLANT /ORG.
COMPLAINANT IN APPEAL NO. A/21/2016.
FOR THE ADV. ADHE IS PRESENT FOR THE RESPONDENT / ORG. O.P. IN
RESPONDENT: APPEAL NO. A/21/2016 AND ADV. AGRAWAL FOR THE RESPONDENT
/ORG. COMPLAINANT IN APPEAL NO. A/463/2015
DATED: 28/01/2026
ORDER
COMMON ORDER
(Delivered on 28/01/2026)
PER MS. S.D. WANDHARE , HON’BLE MEMBER.
1. The appeal (FA No.463/2015) is preferred by the original non-applicant,
Jaika Motors Ltd through Branch Manager, being aggrieved by the order
passed on 14/07/2015 in Misc.Application No.01/2013 (for short as “impugned
order”) by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
##PAGE2##Chandrapur (for short as “learned District Forum”), vide Section 15 of the
Consumer Protection Act, 1986. So also, the appeal (FA No.21/2016) is preferred
by the original applicant, Anita Rajkamal Bankar, being aggrieved by the
impugned order of the learned District Forum.
The parties of the appeal are hereinafter referred to by their original
nomenclature as the applicant and the non-applicant respectively for better
appreciation.
2. The facts that emerge from the present matter are that the applicant has
filed the present application under Section 25 of the Consumer Protection Act,
1986 for recovery of the decretal amount. It is submitted that the applicant had
earlier filed Consumer Complaint No. 200/2009 against the non-applicant before
the learned District Forum and by order dated 06/05/2010, the non-applicant
was directed to return vehicle No.MH-34-M-6220 within 30 days, to pay
Rs.1,500/- per day as damages from 04/08/2009 till delivery of possession and to
pay Rs.25,000/- towards mental and physical agony and Rs.1,000/- as costs. It is
also submitted that the non-applicant failed to comply with the said order and
total recoverable amount comes to Rs.27,39,056/-. It is further submitted that out
of the said amount, the non-applicant has deposited only Rs.6,32,000/- and no
further payment was made to the applicant till 07/12/2012. It is asserted that a
balance amount of Rs.21,07,056/- remains due and payable. Therefore, the
applicant has filed the application against the non-applicant for seeking
recovery of the said amount under Section 25(3) of the Consumer Protection Act,
1986.
3. The non-applicants were duly served upon the notice of application and
accordingly, they appeared in the matter. However, they failed to submit their
response and therefore, the learned District Forum had proceeded the
complaint without written version of the O.P. by order dated 30/10/2013.
4. After considering the material and documents filed on record and
hearing both the parties, the learned District Forum with its impugned order
dated 14/07/2015 in Misc.Application No.01/2013 ordered to calculate the
##PAGE3##amount due and outstanding as per the order dated 06/05/2010 in Consumer
Complaint No.200/2009 and to forward the recovery file to the District Collector,
Chandrapur, directed to recover the outstanding amount by taking steps against
the movable and immovable properties of the non-applicant.
5. Being aggrieved by said impugned order, the original non-applicant
preferred the appeal (FA No.463/2015) on the grounds that the learned District
Forum failed to consider the letters dated 12/10/2012, 27/11/2012 and 14/12/2012
w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.