STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. NANDA SAMANDAR – Appellant
Versus
PAPPU – Respondent
M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)
APPEAL NO. 420/2016 Dr. Nanda Samandar W/o Vikas Samandar R/o 99, L.I.G. Colony Dhar (M.P.) ... Appellant VERSUS.
1. Pappu S/o Ramesh Dabi R/o Village Jeerapur Post Lunhera Tahasil Dharampuri District Dhar (M.P.)
2. Director Patidar Hospital Mandu Road Dhar (M.P.) ... Respondents APPEAL NO. 437/2016 Pappu S/o Ramesh Dabi R/o Village Jeerapur Post Lunhera Tahasil Dharampuri District Dhar (M.P.) ... Appellant VERSUS.
1. Dr. Nanda Samandar Patidar Hospital District Dhar (M.P.)
3. Director Patidar Hospital Mandu Road Dhar (M.P.) ... Respondents BEFORE;
HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:
SHRI NITIN PANDIT, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT – PAPPU MS. KHWAHISH YADAV, LEARNED COUNSEL APPEARS ON BEHALF OF SHRI AKASH TELANG, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR OPPOSITE PARTY NO.1 DR. NANDA SAMANDAR.
SHRI AJAY DUBEY, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR OPPOSITE PARTY NO.2-
PATIDAR HOSPITAL.
O R D E R
( 28.01.2026 )
The following order of the Bench was delivered by Dr.
Monika Malik, Member.
This order will govern disposal of above mentioned two appeals No. 420/2016 (filed by opposite part
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.