SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 636

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MPPKVVCO.LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SAMMAR SINGH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS.SAPNA AGGARWAL ,Respondent Advocate:

e/;izns’k jkT; miHkksDrk fookn izfrrks"k.k vk;ksx]

76] vjjs k fgYl] Hkksiky-

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

izFke vihy Øekad&732@2017 ¼izLrqr vihy ftyk vk;ksx] ujflagiqj }kjk izdj.k Øekad& 18@2014 esa ikfjr vkn's k fnuakd 10@03@2017 ls mn~Hkwr½ ,DthD;wfVo bta hfu;j]

e/;izns'k iow Z {ks= fo|qr forj.k dEiuh fyfeVsM]

ftyk ujflga iqj &&&& vihykFkhZ fo:)

lEej flag vkRet jkeyky iVsy]

fuoklh&HkkSjk] rglhy rsUnw[ksM+k]

ftyk ujflga iqj] e-iz- &&&& izR;FkhZ %% le{k %%

ekuuh; U;k;ewfrZ lquhrk ;kno & v/;{k ekuuh; MkW- eksfudk efyd & lnL;

%% i{kdkjx.k n~okjk %%

vihykFkhZ dh vkjs ls Jh jktho vkpk;Z vf/koäkA izR;FkhZ dh vkjs ls Jh foods vkuan usek vf/koäkA vkns’k ¼fnuakd 29@01@2026 dks ikfjr½ ekuuh; v/;{k U;k;ewfrZ lquhrk ;kno vuqlkj %&

1- ;g vihy miHkksäk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e] 1986 dh /kkjk 15 ds varxZr ftyk miHkksäk fookn izfrrks"k.k vk;ksx] ujflagiqj ¼la{ksi esa ßftyk vk;ksxÞ½ ds izdj.k Øekad&18@2014 es a ikfjr vkns'k fnuakd 10@03@2017 l s O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- ifjoknh }kjk lfa {kIr esa ifjokn bl vk'k; dk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd mlds [ksr ds mij ls 11 ds-Ogh- dh cM+h ykbZu fudyh gqbZ gSA mDr ykbZu ds rkj dkQh uhps gks x;s gSa vkSj mldh xUus dh Qly ls Vdjkus yxs gSa] gok esa rkjksa esa Lik

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top